|
|
California Cancer Registry Volume I: Data Standards and Data Dictionary Source: Cancer Reporting in California: Abstracting and Coding Procedures for Hospitals (California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Vol. I), updated May 2007 |
|
|
|
Beginning with breast cancer cases diagnosed January 1, 1996, the Bloom-Richardson grading system may be used.
Synonyms include: Modified Bloom-Richardson, Scarff-Bloom-Richardson, SBR Grading, BR Grading, Elston-Ellis modification of Bloom-Richardson grading system. This grading scheme is based on three morphologic features as follows:
degree of tumor tubule formation
tumor mitotic acitivity
nuclear pleomorphism of tumor cells (nuclear grade)
Seven possible scores are condensed into three Bloom-Richardson grades. The three grades then translate into well-differentiated (BR low grade), moderately differentiated (BR intermediate grade) and poorly differentiated (BR high grade).
|
Tumor tubule formation |
Score |
|
>75% of tumor cells arranged in tubules |
1 |
|
>10% and <75% |
2 |
|
<10% |
3 |
|
Number of mitoses (low power scanning (X100), find most mitotically tumor area, proceed to high power (x400) |
|
|
<10 mitoses in 10 high-power fields |
1 |
|
>10 and <20 mitoses |
2 |
|
>20 mitoses per 10 high power fields |
3 |
|
Nuclear pleomorphism (nuclear grade) |
|
|
Cell nuclei are uniform in size and shape, relatively small, have dispersed chromatin patterns, and are without prominent nucleoli |
1 |
|
Cell nuclei are somewhat pleomorphic, have nucleoli, and are intermediate size |
2 |
|
Cell nuclei are relatively large, have prominent nucleoli or multiple nucleoli, coarse chromatin patterns, and vary in size and shape |
3 |
To obtain the final Bloom-Richardson score, add score from tubule formation plus number of mitoses score, plus score from nuclear pleomorphism. The combined score converts to the following BR grade:
|
Bloom-Richardson combined scores |
Differentiation/BR Grade |
ICD-O-3 6th digit |
|
3, 4, 5 |
Well-differentiated (BR low grade) |
1 |
|
6, 7 |
Moderately differentiated (BR intermediate grade) |
2 |
|
8, 9 |
Poorly differentiated (BR high grade) |
3 |
There are coding rules and conventions to be used to code breast cancer cases. Use grade or differentiation information from the breast histology in the following order:
Bloom-Richardson scores 3-9
Bloom-Richardson grade (low, intermediate, high)
Nuclear grade
Terminology (well diff, mod diff…)
Histologic grade (grade I, grade ii…)
Caution : In this grading system, the terms low, intermediate, and high are codes 1, 2, and 3 respectively. This is an exception to the usual rule for all other grading systems which code "low", "intermediate", and "high" as 2, 3, and 4 respectively. In the Bloom-Richardson system, if grades 1, 2, and 3 are specified, these should be coded 1, 2, and 3 respectively.
|
Bloom-Richardson scores |
Bloom-Richardson scores |
Nuclear Grade |
Terminology |
Histologic Grade |
Code |
|
3- 5 points |
Low Grade |
1/3, 1/2 |
Well Differentiated |
(BR low grade) |
1 |
|
6, 7 points |
Intermediate Grade |
2/3 |
Moderately differentiated |
(BR intermediate grade) |
2 |
|
8, 9 points |
High Grade |
2/2, 3/3 |
Poorly Differentiated |
(BR high grade) |
3 |
SEER Program Manual entry available
COC Facility Oncology Registry Data Standards (FORDS manual) entry available